
I’ve mentioned in previous posts the cooperative situation in which my church functions. Like a large and growing number of newly planted Southern Baptist churches, we are not affiliated with a local association. We do cooperate on a modest level through our state convention. Currently, the majority of our missions dollars are being invested in a four-year international partnership to plant churches among the Pachitea-Panao Quechua people of the Andes Mountains in Peru. While we remain Southern Baptist in our doctrine, we tend to take more of a “point-of-contact” approach to our missions giving. Our people want to see where their missions dollars go. They want to see and touch the impact of their missions giving in a personal way. They are not satisfied with, nor supportive of, sending all of their missions offerings to a centralized Baptist fund.
But, lately, I have felt led to involve our people in a more direct involvement in church planting and missions in North America. I want us to get involved in planting strong evangelical churches in places where there are no churches. I wonder … how many more churches can we plant in the suburbs of Atlanta? What about those places where people have basically no access to the Gospel of Jesus Christ … none at all? You know … those places where it just doesn’t work to run a couple of ads in the newspaper, do a bulk mailer, and have 200 people in attendance within four weeks. What about the places where the spiritual landscape is cold and dark … the Shadowlands of North America?
My friend and Mission M Possible ministry partner, Roger Ferrell, has also struggled with this same desire. In fact, he’s been doing something about it. Roger has been doing some research over the fast few months, trying to locate those places in North America where there is little or no Gospel access … places where there are no solid, evangelical churches. It hasn’t been easy. Our denomination (interestingly) has no information on this at all. But,believe it or not, these places do exist. Many are in Canada, but there are also some completely unchurched communities in the United States, as well.
So, Roger developed the idea for a new missional network (well, I helped a little bit) that we want to call The Shadowlands Project. Here’s our idea, in a nutshell:
- Locate and target the most unchurched communities in North America.
- Target one community at a time for the planting of a healthy, doctrinally sound, evangelical church.
- Locate missional churches willing to invest in a network which has the sole purpose of planting churches in the those communities.
- Invite those churches to invest, financially, in the support of a church planting family and/or team to relocate to that community and begin the planting of a healthy church.
- Challenge those churches to invest a portion their North American missions volunteer efforts in the support of that new church plant.
- Provide Church Planting training events and missions experiences for church groups through our “training wing” of the network, Mission M Possible.
- Once the church planting task in that community is complete, shift the focus of the network to the next community on the Shadowlands strategic list.
We think this may be a new level … a new generation … of Baptist cooperation. It could be an especially attractive missional network for the rapidly increasing plethora of non-associational Southern Baptist churches. This could also be an effective, inexpensive way for new church plants to immediately and directly get involved in planting new churches and rapidly get church planting established in the “DNA” of that new church.
For the record … Roger and I are both lifelong Southern Baptists, but we will certainly welcome the input and cooperation of like-minded and like-hearted believers from other denominations or non-denominations. We just want to plant churches. We just want to be a part of a huge, difficult, challenging vision. But we do envision that this will be something that many Southern Baptist churches will be able to “wrap their minds and hearts around.”
We’re not asking anyone to abandon any association or group that they are a part and to which they are faithful. We simply want to offer a cutting-edge, “missions frontier,” point-of-contact missional network for churches that are up for the challenge. This won’t be easy. It won’t be something that someone can just mail a check to and then forget about it. The Shadowlands Project will require a real, hands-on, practical missions commitment.
Just think … if we could get just 50 churches to pledge support of just $1,000 per year, we could fund a church planting family (and perhaps another team member) in a manner that is generous and responsible. Not with a meager, insulting, welfare-level pittance of supplemental support. We could support a family with a livable salary until the church was established. We could give a church planter on the “last frontier” in North America the support of a strong and viable network. We could greatly increase this man’s opportunity for a successful, thriving ministry.
What do you think? Would your church be interested in The Shadowlands Project? Give us some input. If you’re interested in becoming a part of this new network and vision,please send me an e-mail with your phone number on it. Roger or I would love to talk to you about it.
February 27, 2007 at 6:31 pm
I’m in. But then you knew that.
I did talk with Ed Stetzer from NAMB today. (He gave a great talk at churchplanters.com conference.) I asked if they had any new info on unchurched towns. He said they did not.
But that is not to say they do not have any helpful information on this subject. They do know information by county and this has been helpful in my research. They are doing a great job over there on research (check out http://www.peoplegroups.org) , but this is not a project that they have the manpower or time to do right now. So we are glad to help.
Thanks for articulating this so well. I hope folks join us (and the missionaries already serving in the field) in reaching the most unchurched places.
February 27, 2007 at 6:32 pm
Geoff,
I like the idea. I’m all for planting more and more. I agree about Atlanta.
February 27, 2007 at 6:51 pm
I’d love to hear more about this!
February 27, 2007 at 7:34 pm
Geoff-
God bless your vision for the unreached, unchurched sectors of North America. Are you familiar with RHMA, Rural Home Missionry Association? We’ve become acquainted with them in the past year or so, and from what I’ve seen, they may be able to help you target areas of special need. You can find out more about them at http://www.rhma.org/
Let me know what you think about them. They will host a conference for small & rural churchs in mid-April in Morton, IL, and in May in Lancaster, PA.
Kat
February 27, 2007 at 10:01 pm
Rog-
Good word.
Kevin-
As we get the vision up and running, we’ll keep you in the loop. I know where to find you.
Jerry-
Drop my buddy, Roger, a line at roger@missionmpossible.net . He’ll be able to articulate this vision very well.
Kat-
I looked briefly at the site. Very interesting. I’ll pass the info on to Roger. They may, indeed, be a great source of research info.
February 28, 2007 at 8:36 am
Kat,
Thanks for the contact with RHMA. I spoke this morning with Ron Klassen, the Director of that organization, and found a friend who shares my heart for unchurched places. We look forward to partnering together in the future. He did not have a list of unchurched places, but was very interested in our research. He said that he had heard Southern Baptists were backing off of planting in rural areas (due to Strategic Focus Cities) and I assured him that we would do all we could to spread the word throughout the SBC that rural places need our help.
I liked him, and look forward to walking and working alongside RHMA in the days ahead.
It may be good for one of us to attend their Small Town Pastor conference and share information about the Shadowlands Project. I feel certain the conference attendees would be a source of good information.
February 28, 2007 at 9:55 am
Roger-
We will be at the conference in Morton, IL, in mid-April. Hope we’ll get to meet you.
Kat
February 28, 2007 at 10:26 am
I’m interested. I’d like to ask a question about the definition of “unchurched.” Will that be defined as areas where there are few existing church buildings, or will it be more defined by areas where churches may exist, but are not reaching their communities. For instance, there are 24,000 people in the Parish (County) in which I live. There is an astounding number of local churches (80 total churches with 55 Bapist churches). However, less than 1/3 regularly attend any type of worship service. If numbers continue, in 10 years, it will be less than 1/4. Is that and unchurched area?
February 28, 2007 at 11:33 am
geoff,
i’m not against what you’re trying to do. dont take me wrong. but, let me ask you something…..who put the money into starting the church where you are now? was it sbc cp dollars? i’m just wondering.
because, i’ve noticed that many of the ones who cry out that sbc cp dollars are not doing all that they should do, and that there are better ways to start churches….usually, their churches were started by sbc cp dollars! that may not be the case with you…i dont know. i’m just asking. but, i’ve noticed that many of the missional church starts out here have leaders who keep saying that the sbc is not changing enough….not spending thier money right, could be doing more….is leaving out missional thinkers from leadership positions….not letting them speak at sbc pastors conf.’s…etc. these same churches were started with sbc cp dollars, and with help from local associations, etc. and, now that they are started…it’s almost a “dog biting the hand that fed them” attitude. is it not?
bro., believe me…i love you in the Lord, and i thank God for how He has used you in cadiz. and, i’m all for starting churches…and yes, missional churches. but, i’m not liking the attitude i seem to be hearing from a lot of young church planters and missional types about let’s have less to do with that ole sbc crowd….they’re going the way of the dino’s….they are not as hip as we are, and they wont recognize us as legit. whenever, the sbc and the state conventions and the assoc. are starting many of these same missional churches.
that’s the way i’m seeing it anyway.
david
February 28, 2007 at 12:20 pm
Roger & Kat-
Good connection and contact. Way to network!
Cyle-
Your community sounds almost identical to mine, though mine is smaller. There are about 13,000 people and 60+ churches, but only about 3,000 in any given church on Sunday. But I don’t think that I would classify our communities as unchurched … just ineffectively churched, or perhaps “de-churched.” The communities that Roger and I have in mind in this “Shadowlands Project” are those communities on our continent with few healthy, evangelical churches or no churches whatsoever … those communities do exist. It just seems that our denomination has become so focused on “Strategic Focus Cities” that we have done so at the expense of the unchurched or rapidly “de-churching” small communities throughout the USA and Canada.
David-
I’m glad you asked. Actually, there was no denominational money involved in starting Crossroads Fellowship. The Nehemiah director at Southern tried to get me to do the “Nehemiah internship” as I recall, but I didn’t do it. My sponsoring local church simply added me to their staff as a “church planting pastor.” They supported my family for the first year, and we stepped down that support over a three-year period. It was the ultimate example of “point-of-contact” misions support – no denominational entity involved at any level.
I agree with much of your assessment of the attitudes of some of our planters. While we started a church with no denom money, we immediately began financial cooperation through the SBC and KBC. I know, personally, church planters who received SBC/KBC funds and yet they have not given to the CP. I had one tell me personally once, rather proudly, that he “didn’t give a dime to any of them and didn’t feel bad about it.”
These attitudes are a natural outflow of our cooperative system and the resulting feeling of “entitlement.” I think I have stated my sentiments before … denominations should not start churches. Churches should plant churches. If a church cannot afford to plant another church, it should partner with other similar churches to do so … but directly, not by sending money to the SBC “fund in the sky.” It is simply too impersonal.
That’s why I think this “Shadowlands Project” idea is an awesome opportunity to network churches for the specific purpose of planting churches in towns where there are no churches. Personally, I am growing weary of all of the money we are pumping into the big-city suburbs while Christianity is declining so rapidly in the more rural areas, villages, and small towns.
So, David, do you think that the project is something that your church could get involved in … being part of planting churches where there are none … not right in our southern back yards?
February 28, 2007 at 12:46 pm
I’d rather give money to start churches than to have a Pastor’s conference so we can all get fat spiritually.
I started a church with SBC $$. Let me tell you was grateful for the $$. But you know only 1 person from the denomination ever came to check us out. We were left to do it all ourself.
Geoff,
This is a great idea. I don’t hear you bashing existing churches.
February 28, 2007 at 1:00 pm
Thanks, Kevin
No, I’m not going to “bash” existing churches. I may not care for some methods and attitudes, but I can remember that we’re all on the “same team,” even if some of my brethren have difficulty doing so.
And I do understand some (a lot, actually) of David’s concern. I’ve encountered the attitude of “biting the hand that feeds you.” Unfortunately, the reality in SBC life is that denominational “hand” often has you on a “starvation diet,” complete with rules and regulations that prevent you from directly seeking support from local churches. It’s a church planting failure-inducing “catch 22.” I think that’s why local churches need to be banding together to plant churches … not denominational entities.
I think I do have a little ground to stand on and some freedom, since I am “outside” the system. There can be no financial repurcussions for me for “speaking out.” I am fully supported by my wonderful, generous, faithful local church. But for many others who receive $500 or maybe even $1000 a month (a drop in the denominational bucket, but a life-changing amount of money for a struggling church planter and family), it’s just enough to silence any criticism of the system.
Think about it … the more people on the payroll, the less dissension there is likely to be. Hmmmmm…
But, I am chasing a rabbit, aren’t I?
February 28, 2007 at 1:12 pm
geoff,
you ought to call my former dom from the extended missions network in hernando, ms. what you are talking about is right up his alley, and he might be interested in being involved in this. his name is wade steelman. he’s a good guy. that association started some churches, and is currently starting churches, in that area. and, he is big time into starting churches.
david
February 28, 2007 at 1:21 pm
Thanks, David
And believe me, I do hear where you’re coming from. It’s a bit disingenuous to take money from someone then gripe about it.
But, than again, that’s always been the American way!
February 28, 2007 at 1:32 pm
This sounds exciting. We often forget there are many places in the States that do not get the gospel.
I am out in a small town of Graceville, north of Panama City. I’ll only be here for a few more months.
February 28, 2007 at 2:51 pm
Cyle,
I’ve been researching this for two years, and would be the first to admit it is difficult to decide which of two areas is most unchurched. It’s not like comparing apples and oranges; its more like comparing apples, a mattress, and gunpowder with oranges, a sofa and detergent. There are just too many variables!
With each candidate (and we get input from guys in the field all over) we will just crunch the numbers and spend some time in prayer. I will make my case and we will put it out there to participating churches. The data will get a place under consideration, but prayer will make the decision. Is that fair enough?
That said, I really hope we can start with towns that actually do not have ANY churches. They are out there, and getting people access to the gospel is my primary concern. If there is a church preaching Christ, whether it is traditional or contemporary, AOG or Baptist, young or old, that is access to the gospel. But where there is no church, those are the places that need the help first and most.
February 28, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Volfan,
. But let me say this with as much emphasis as you can in email – this is not a reactionary movement. I am not and never have been anti-SBC. I talk with NAMB, state convention and associational guys every day. I am on associational staff here part-time, volunteer with the Network of Baptist Associations, and help do church planting probes with the GBC. I am fully supportive of our denomination and what’s more, think we are headed for even better days.
I know you already got a response from Geoff, and yes, he is a little more outspoken than I am
Shadowlands is a cooperative effort, not a divisive one. We have gotten emails and phone calls from NAMB guys offering to pray and help and I am all about partnering wherever we can. We just didn’t have a program in place for this yet. Now we do.
Just as Acts 1:8 has certain goals and state conventions have state partnerships, there are a group of us who just want to go after the most unchurched places. And apparently God has put that on the hearts of many Southern Baptists because many are responding with a resounding “Yes! Let’s do this.” Southern Baptists have always been concerned about spiritually dark places and continue to be. We are glad to partner with all our agencies and any churches who feel so led in getting after this task.
In fact, if you guys who are buying in could do so without reactionary statements or snide remarks about SBC institutions, that would help this work. I do not want us to get labeled as being “angry young men.” The only thing I am angry about is that some people are not getting to hear about Jesus. And the only one to be angry at about that is me. So it is high time I got off my chair and did something about it. Anybody else want in?
February 28, 2007 at 3:13 pm
The only thing I’m angry about is that the ocean is so far away.
February 28, 2007 at 3:16 pm
And Roger,
I guess I’m a bit along the lines of my fisherman friend, Peter.
If something enters my mind, it tends to find its way out of my mouth (or my keyboard).
February 28, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Geoff.. I’m not angry.. the ocean is just 200 metres away..
but we have a big shark hassling surfers at the moment so I am vewy vewy careful.
Steve
February 28, 2007 at 3:28 pm
If I was “down unda,” I would take care of him for you, mate!
February 28, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Boyd,
Somehow your comment got “spammed” by WordPress. Not sure why.
I know exactly where Graceville is! We go through there all the time! Right down 231. We have a house that we rent 2 or 3 times a year on St. George Island. I love to disappear down there and fish the surf a few times a year. I’m not one for surfing, but I love the fishing!
Here’s a bit of my fishing fun on SGI!
http://geoffbaggett.files.wordpress.com/2006/12/big-shark.jpg
Geoff
February 28, 2007 at 3:38 pm
Boyd,
Are you in school? Where are you headed next?
Geoff
February 28, 2007 at 5:43 pm
Geoff: great day in the morning! what has happened to your print on your blog comments. Even your blog banner has gone fine print. selahV
February 28, 2007 at 6:35 pm
Everything looks fine here. It must be something in your settings.
March 1, 2007 at 7:12 am
What a great idea!!!
I’m new to blogdom (trinitymissions.wordpress.com), but I think this is a really, really cool idea.
March 1, 2007 at 10:21 am
Drew,
Welcome to the Shore! How did you find your way here?
Do you think your church could “buy in” to a vision like this?
Geoff
March 1, 2007 at 10:22 am
BTW Drew … you don’t play receiver for the Tennessee Titans, do you?
March 1, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Geoff,
Unfortunately, I’m not related to the famous Drew Bennett of the Tennessee Titans. Sorry to disappoint.
I see the vision you have, and agree with it, completely. If you check out the new blog I listed earlier, you will see similar tones on that site to what you write above. This is basically the vision of our church for Baltimore, which has maybe 2 sound churches.
I direct the missions and outreach at http://www.trinitymd.org (well, not online, but at the actual church!!).
Keep me posted on further developments (drew@trinitymd.org).
March 1, 2007 at 10:10 pm
Drew-
Not disappointed at all. I saw on your blog some mention of Baltimore. I thought, “Surely we didn’t give Drew to Baltimore … like we did Steve McNair!”
I will, most definitely, keep you posted. I’ll make sure Roger has you on our contact list. We would sure like to have a good group of churches on board and launch out into our first “unreached community” by this fall.
Geoff
March 1, 2007 at 11:51 pm
All,
I am in an email conversation right now with Gary Smith, my friend in Eastern Canada. He leads church planting there and will be providing us with a complete list of the Most Unchurched Places there. This part of North America is truly the Shadowlands with 6 million Quebecois (french-speaking people in Quebec), the largest unreached people group in North America. I will keep in touch, but will tell you this is probably where we will need to begin. Here there are no associations, no SBC seminary, and few churches. If there is a more needy unchurched region, I have not found it. But I still have much to learn, so keep the comments and the research coming. And spread the word about Shadowlands on your blogs, will you?
January 28, 2009 at 11:50 am
Need to contact Wade Stillman, of th eExtended Missions Net, in Hernado, MS, concerning a family in his area needing assistance.